The discovery of massive galaxy that stopped
making any new stars by the time the Universe was only 1.65 billion years old
means we may have to rethink our theories on how galaxies formed. The galaxy,
known as ZF-COSMOS-20115, formed all of its stars (more than three times as
many as our Milky Way has today) through an extreme star-burst event.
But it stopped forming stars to become a “red
and dead” galaxy not much more than a billion years after the Big Bang. Such
galaxies are common in our Universe today but not expected to have existed at
this ancient epoch. Galaxies turn red when they stop forming stars due to the
resulting absence of hot, blue stars that have very short lifetimes.
This discovery by our team sets a new record
for the earliest massive red galaxy, with details published in Nature this
month. It is an incredibly rare find that poses a new challenge to galaxy
evolution models to accommodate the existence of such galaxies much earlier in
the Universe.
An earlier discovery
To put this discovery in context, I’d like to
give a short, personal history of research on early massive galaxies. In 2004 I
wrote an uncannily similar Nature paper about the existence of massive, old galaxies
in the early Universe that were discovered in deep near-infrared surveys. At
that time we were peering back across space to 3 billion years after the Big
Bang.
These were a challenge for the models of
galaxy formation that scientists were working with at the time, the start of a
period where our pictures of how galaxies formed were rapidly being rewritten.
At the time, a picture of galaxies forming by lots of mergers in hierarchicalassembly was in vogue. The problem was that this meant that today’s massive
galaxies were in little bits billions of years ago.
But significant changes were made – driven in
part by observations of the abundance of early massive galaxies, the
observations of large gas-rich disk galaxies at these epochs and the discovery
of “red nuggets” – extremely compact massive elliptical galaxies which stopped
forming stars early on.
We moved to a picture where most galaxy growth
and formation was driven by the formation of stars within the galaxy itself,
from cosmic gas coming in to the galaxy. This gas is fed into galaxies along
the cosmic web by cold streams that are effective early on and allow us to grow
massive galaxies more quickly in the computer modelling.
Many, many astronomers contributed to these
developments and it was fun to play a minor role.
The new discovery
So what about this new discovery? This stems
from the ZFOURGE survey, a deep near-infrared imaging survey we have been
conducting on the Magellan telescopes in Chile, since 2010. Back in 2013, one
of our students, Caroline Straatman of Leiden University, discovered a
population of pale red dots in the ZFOURGE survey.
These dots were bright in the near-infrared
but very faint in the 35 other wavelength bands we observed. This peak
suggested the presence of roughly 500 million year old stars but at a huge
cosmic redshift. In the local Universe this peak appears in blue light, so the
redshift points to a time around 1.5 billion years after the Big Bang. The
light suggested that no young stars were present, and the near-infrared
brightness suggested these were massive objects (1011 solar masses).
To put this in context, our Milky Way has been
growing continuously for 12 billion years but is 3-5 times less massive. Even
more remarkably, the galaxies looked like ellipticals and were almost point
sources, even with high-resolution Hubble Space Telescope observations. They
were less than 5,000 light years across. Extremely dense red nuggets at an
earlier time than anyone had suspected.
Lines in the spectrum
In 2012 a powerful new near-infrared
spectrograph was commissioned on the W M Keck telescopes in Hawaii. Last year
we used it to get a two-night exposure on some of these objects. We were amazed
when we got a spectrum of the brightest (and most massive). They showed the
distinct signature of Balmer absorption lines of stars around 500 million years
old. Importantly there was no sign of current star-formation.
This galaxy was already massive and between
500 million and 1 billion years old. It must have formed extremely fast, and
then its star formation died quickly. This extreme behaviour could require
significant rewriting of our pictures of galaxy formation in the first billion
years of cosmic history.
Why? Well, we think galaxies form in the
centres of halos of cold dark matter. Dark matter particles is not made of
ordinary atoms, and particle physicists are still trying to detect these in the
laboratory. These halos can form very early and act as seeds for galaxy
formation giving it a kick start. Without dark matter it would be difficult to
form any galaxy.
The problem is at this early time there are
barely enough massive dark matter halos to accommodate such massive galaxies.
As a consequence in simulated Universes we don’t find this population of
non-star forming galaxies so early, nor do we find the massive ancestors with
extreme star-formation rates a billion years earlier.
So, do we need two recipes for galaxy
formation where some form extremely quickly and the rest take 12 billion years?
Time will tell. The history of this field has
shown that the theoretical community has a very strong record of postdiction
(as opposed to prediction), and I expect a slew of papers will turn up in the
next few weeks to explain this object!
Teasing of theorists aside, galaxy formation
is a very difficult field to work in; the astrophysics are complex and it is
very much driven by new observations which is why it is so much fun to work in.
Meanwhile our groups are pursuing the quest for massive galaxies to even
earlier times. We have designed new filters to identify these and hope to start
a new survey using the Gemini telescopes this year. Theorists, get your predictions
in now.
Post A Comment:
0 comments: